1194 We're Bring LIED TO About IRAN WAR. Its MUCH WORSE and Trump is FULL OF IT

EN English (FR IT PT SP)

1194 We're Bring LIED TO About IRAN WAR. Its MUCH WORSE and Trump is FULL OF IT

10 Mar 2026 The Iran war is far from over, contrary to claims by Donald Trump. The situation is escalating, with France sending a strike carrier group to the Persian Gulf and the largest attacks on Iran since the war began. The US is attempting to provoke a sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites, potentially leading to a blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and a significant increase in oil prices. The situation in Iran is escalating, with attacks on critical infrastructure in Tehran and potential for a wider conflict. The US is considering releasing oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) to mitigate the impact of the conflict on oil prices, but this move could have significant consequences for other countries, particularly in Europe and Asia. The potential for a sectarian war between Sunnis and Shias, fuelled by US actions, adds to the complexity and uncertainty of the situation. The sinking of oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz and the ongoing war in Ukraine are causing significant ecological damage. The situation in the Middle East is escalating, with the US threatening increased air strikes and Iran preparing for total war. The speaker predicts a false flag attack will be used to justify further military action, potentially involving sleeper cells or a cyber attack. Hezbollah has joined the conflict, launching rockets into Israeli airspace and potentially targeting high-ranking Israeli officials. A mysterious blackout in Iran, possibly caused by a non-nuclear EMP weapon, adds to the escalating tensions. Meanwhile, a satellite company delayed the release of Middle East imagery, raising suspicions of concealed events.

Key points

* Iran War Status: The war is not ending but escalating, contrary to public perception. * Trump’s Influence: Despite his history of falsehoods, the market reacts to Trump’s words, even if unrelated to the situation. * Escalating Conflict: France deploying a strike carrier group and the largest attacks on Iran, including a blackout in Tehran, indicate the war is intensifying. * US Military Presence: The USS Abraham Lincoln and its armada are positioned outside the Strait of Hormuz, acting as gatekeepers for Iranian ships. * Iranian Strategy: Iran is attempting to lure the US into a potential kill zone in the Strait of Hormuz, while the US aims to provoke a sectarian war between Sunnis and Shiites. * Potential Consequences: A war between the US and Iran could result in significant economic consequences, including skyrocketing oil prices. * Oil Price Manipulation: The text suggests that suppressing oil prices while simultaneously instigating conflicts that could cause oil spikes might be a strategy to maintain control over the petro-dollar system and limit China’s access to oil. * Unpredictable Geopolitical Situation: The text highlights the unpredictable nature of the current geopolitical situation, particularly in the Middle East, with conflicting statements from US officials about the war’s trajectory and escalating tensions involving Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Bahrain, and Kuwait. * Potential for Escalation: The text warns of the potential for further escalation in the Middle East, with attacks on oil refineries and water desalination plants increasing the risk of a wider conflict. * Russian Tactics in Ukraine: Using critical infrastructure as shields, similar to their actions at the Zaposia nuclear power plant, creating confusion and controversy. * Trump’s Threat to Iran: Issuing a severe threat to Iran, stating that any action disrupting oil flow in the Strait of Hormuz would result in devastating retaliation from the United States. * Questioning Humanitarian Intentions: Highlighting the disconnect between Trump’s public statements about humanitarian concerns and the actions of his administration, suggesting a lack of genuine concern for the well-being of others. * US Stance on Iran: The US aims to prevent Iran from rebuilding its critical infrastructure, unlike its approach to Ukraine. * Iran’s Military Strategy: Iran is targeting critical infrastructure in Tehran, unlike Russia’s approach in Ukraine. * Potential Conflict in the Hormuz Strait: The US’s actions in the Hormuz Strait, particularly regarding Chinese ships, could escalate tensions with China. * Potential for Escalation: The situation could escalate into a world war if the aerial denial against Iran is not broken. * Chinese Involvement: The possibility of a Chinese ship being seized or attacked is increasing, potentially leading to a major controversy. * Media Narrative: The media is already priming the public for this potential conflict, with pundits like Gordon Chang advocating for aggressive action against China. * War Escalation: War has worsened, contrary to Trump’s attempts to downplay the situation. * Market Manipulation: Governments are using damage control tactics to prevent market crashes caused by war and rising oil prices. * Sectarian War Concerns: Gulf countries suspect the US is trying to incite a Sunni-Shia war, potentially involving Saudi Arabia and Iran. * US Involvement in Iran Conflict: The US is potentially obligated to support protesters in Iran and could face consequences if they don’t. * Strategic Oil Reserve Release: The G7 nations are considering a coordinated release of oil from their strategic reserves to cool down oil prices. * Financial Implications of Oil Release: Releasing oil at a lower price could result in financial losses for some countries, particularly those without large oil reserves like the US. * US Strategic Oil Reserve: The US has a strategic oil reserve, unlike other countries. * Oil Price Manipulation: The speaker suggests that the US might benefit from high oil prices and that insiders could profit from it. * Impact of Oil Supply Disruption: The speaker highlights the significant impact of a potential oil supply disruption, with 20% of oil potentially taken offline, far exceeding the capacity of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR). * Environmental Disaster: The ecological impact of the oil tanker sinking in the Strait of Hormuz is expected to be catastrophic, turning the Persian Gulf into a polluted area. * Political Situation: The speaker criticises the political situation, mentioning Lindsey Graham’s actions and Iran’s threats, suggesting that the opposite of Trump’s statements has been financially beneficial. * Military Conflict: The speaker discusses the potential escalation of the conflict, highlighting the effectiveness of Iran’s decentralised defence system against centralised attacks. * Reason for Losing Wars: Acting autonomously leads to problems, exemplified by the inability to win in Afghanistan and Vietnam. * Iranian Response to Threats: Iranians are undeterred by threats of increased air strikes, recognising the existential nature of the situation and preparing for total war. * Strategic Positioning: Success comes from anticipating trends and acting ahead of the curve, as demonstrated by those who profit from investments before widespread recognition. * Investment Advice Disclaimer: The speaker clarifies that their opinion on the situation is not financial advice. * Current Situation Analysis: The speaker believes the situation is not at its peak and neither side is willing to compromise, except for Iran’s minor concessions. * Potential Consequences: The speaker highlights the potential consequences of escalating tensions, including the risk of losing hearts and minds, and the moral implications of the humanitarian crisis. * Potential for False Flag Operations: The speaker suggests that a major event, potentially a cyber attack, could be staged and blamed on Iran to justify military action. * Lack of History of Iranian Terrorism in the US: The speaker points out that Iran has no history of carrying out terrorist attacks in the United States, although there have been accusations and suspicions. * Public Perception and Support for War: The speaker believes that a major event would sway public opinion and generate support for military action against Iran, even if it’s based on falsehoods. * Humanitarian Narrative as a Tool: The speaker expresses concern about the potential use of a humanitarian narrative to justify actions, highlighting the disparity in how casualties are perceived. * False Flag Concerns: While cautious about making frequent predictions, the speaker acknowledges the possibility of a false flag operation as a catalyst for escalation. * Potential Triggers for Escalation: The speaker suggests that a significant event, such as an aircraft carrier being hit or a drone strike killing soldiers, could be used to push the situation to a critical point. * Hezbollah’s Involvement: Hezbollah has officially joined the conflict, launching rockets into Israeli airspace and potentially causing significant damage and casualties. * Speculation and Unconfirmed Reports: There are unconfirmed reports of high-ranking Israeli officials being targeted or injured, including figures like Ben Gavir and Smeirovich. * International Diplomacy: An unusual one-hour call took place between Putin and Trump, raising questions about the nature of their discussion. * Meeting Time Allocation: 15 minutes per war topic, plus economy discussion, and 7.5 minutes per bullet point. * Speculation on Trump-Putin Call: Possibility of Trump discussing potential nuclear weapon use in the Middle East with Putin and seeking Russia’s stand-down. * Putin’s Position and Leverage: Putin benefits from the situation with increased oil revenues and leverage over Europe, potentially wanting the conflict to continue. * Satellite Imagery Delay: Planet, a satellite company, announced a 14-day delay in releasing imagery from the Middle East, suggesting an attempt to conceal information. * Iran’s Military Actions: While Iran claims to have successfully targeted expensive radars, the lack of significant explosions and the continued existence of military bases suggest a more nuanced situation. * Underground Facilities: The effectiveness of Iran’s attacks on underground facilities remains uncertain, as the observed explosions may not have penetrated deeply enough to cause significant damage. * Underground Detection Technology Limitations: The technology, similar to X-ray but limited to single material types, hinders the identification of what’s beneath the surface. * Speculations on the Situation: Uncertainty surrounds the situation, with possibilities including a failed decapitation attempt, a potential war instigation, or a cover-up. * Saudi Arabia’s Oil Export Ban and Drone Interception: Iran announced a ban on oil exports in the region, coinciding with Saudi Arabia’s interception of drones headed towards an oil field.