1106 CERN Insider Speaks Out (part 2)

-

EN English (FR IT PT SP)

1106 CERN Insider Speaks Out (part 2)  

15 Feb 2026 A CERN insider claims that beings from the future are entering and exiting through portals at the facility. This, coupled with the Mandela Effect and reports of time manipulation, has led to concerns about CERN’s activities. Investigative journalist Miriam Hanine’s article on these concerns was deleted from CERN’s website, but archived versions reveal her exploration of CERN’s research on extra dimensions and its potential for interdimensional communication. 

The text explores the public’s fear and speculation surrounding CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC). It delves into the possibility of the LHC creating black holes or portals, referencing statements from CERN scientists and a lawsuit filed against the organisation. The text also mentions the death of CERN physicist Dr. Edward Mantill in 2016, adding to the unsettling atmosphere. 

 The text explores the mysteries surrounding CERN, the Large Hadron Collider (LHC), and the Higgs Boson. It delves into the unexplained death of Edward Mantel, a researcher who believed in the existence of multiple dimensions, and the potential dangers of CERN’s experiments. The text also addresses public concerns about CERN’s activities, including the creation of black holes and the possibility of opening portals to other dimensions. 

 

Key points

  • * CERN’s Experimentation: Beings from the future, 45,000 years ahead on a separate timeline, are reportedly coming through portals at CERN. * Time Manipulation: There are claims that military agencies and intelligence are involved in a fight to change or alter time at CERN. * Mandela Effect and Time Perception: The speaker expresses concerns about the Mandela Effect and a personal feeling that time is broken, passing too quickly. * CERN’s Experiment: CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is smashing protons together at unprecedented energy levels to uncover the universe’s secrets. * LHC’s Operation: The LHC, a 17-mile underground tunnel, collides protons at nearly the speed of light, generating data for analysis by thousands of scientists. * CERN’s Goal: The experiment aims to find clues about dark matter, dark energy, and the fundamental workings of the universe. * Exotic Particle Observation: CERN reported the observation of three new exotic particles, potentially shedding light on how quarks bind together. * Matter-Antimatter Asymmetry: The beauty quark is crucial for understanding the imbalance between matter and antimatter in the universe, a fundamental mystery with no current explanation. * Extra Dimensions Exploration: Scientists are investigating the existence of extra dimensions as a potential explanation for the universe’s accelerated expansion and the relative weakness of gravity. * CERN’s Mission: Search for evidence of extra dimensions, a legitimate area of research in theoretical physics. * Public Perception: Public is not fully aware of CERN’s potential, especially regarding interdimensional communication. * Controversial Event: CERN’s 2016 Gutard base tunnel opening ceremony sparked speculation about interdimensional portals and unexplained phenomena. * Particle Acceleration Discoveries: Particle accelerators like the LHC have led to the discovery of particles like the top quark and the Higgs boson, enhancing our understanding of the universe. * Black Hole Concerns: While the LHC might produce tiny, harmless black holes that decay into particles, the possibility of their creation raises questions about the existence of extra dimensions and the dissipation of energy. * CERN’s Stance on Safety: CERN asserts that any black holes created at the LHC would be harmless, decay quickly, and confirm the existence of extra dimensions. * CERN’s Goal: The article suggests CERN’s goal extends beyond detecting extra dimensions to actively attempting to penetrate the 11th dimension. * LHC’s Energy Level: The LHC currently operates at 13.6 teraelectronvolts, exceeding the energy threshold predicted for black hole formation in certain theoretical models. * Legal Oversight of CERN: CERN operates under limited jurisdiction, governed by international treaty and collective decisions of its member states, rather than the laws of a single country. * LHC as a Door: CERN’s director for research and scientific computing, Sergio Bertolucci, stated in 2009 that the LHC could discover an extra dimension, describing it as a “door” that could be opened briefly. * Unregulated Research: The article highlights the lack of legal oversight on CERN’s research, particularly concerning the potential risks and ethical implications of their experiments. * Dr. Mantill’s Death: The article mentions the death of CERN physicist Dr. Edward Mantill on July 13th, 2016, from a self-inflicted gunshot wound, after reportedly researching a hidden code in neutrino movement. * Mantel’s Theory: Our universe is one page in a book, each page a separate dimension with its own story, unable to interact with others. * Mantel’s Disappearance: Found dead with research destroyed, leaving a message about the universe as a book. No solid evidence of his existence found online. * CERN’s Activities: Allegedly generating energy explosions affecting Earth’s Schuman resonances, with 2029 as a potential key moment. * CERN’s Safety Measures: CERN argues that the LHC is safe because its energies are lower than those of naturally occurring cosmic rays. * LHC Operations and Future Plans: The LHC restarted in 2015, increased collision activity, and underwent a technical stop. Future plans include increasing beam intensity for more collisions. * CERN’s Stance on the “God Particle”: CERN clarifies that the term “God particle” is a misnomer and that their mission is scientific, not philosophical. * CERN’s Mission: A multicultural collaboration focused on studying the fundamental structure of matter. * Shiva Statue: A diplomatic gift from India symbolising the metaphor between the cosmic dance in Hindu tradition and the movement of subatomic particles. * CERN Logo: Represents particle accelerators and beam lines, reflecting schematic elements of accelerator physics.   

FR Frances (EN IT PT SP)

Français à venir

IT Italiano (EN FR PT SP)

Italiano presto disponibile

PT Português (EN FR IT SP)

Português em breve

SP Español (EN FR IT PT)

Español próximamente

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can't grok Gmail HAL - Privacy Trends unfolding

-
Image
Blame the Daleks : I've never got over the childhood scarring from knowing our sofa was just no match for their death rays! I consider myself fairly well-read, certainly with a vocabulary bigger than England's soccer manager Fabio Capello claims . But thanks to the Daleks I've never read much science fiction so, until today, I'd never heard the word 'grok.' Kim_Cameron   kim cameron   People didn't "get over it". [ http://tcrn.ch/fER72l ] DOES NOT COMPUTE yet - "creepy"  GMAIL   HAL  too far out to GROK. Just wait. Check out his  www.IdentityBlog.com It seems that ' grok ' means " to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed—to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science—and it means as little to us (because of our Earthling assumptions) as color means to a blind man. " @Kim_Cameron is...
Read more

CRM Problems

-
Image
I dug out some depressing numbers from the CRM world: only 30% of companies with a CRM implementation feel that they've had a positive return on their investment. Mostly, the issues are not technical ones (it's not that hard to get the software installed and some superficial training completed). But there are some similarities with many IT projects: Lack of agreed goals and business case "Fail to plan, plan to fail" is the old saw that is daily proved true. I've seen clients invest in new hardware and software for the wrong reasons. (Last year, one IT department wanted to buy new software to secure training for the existing team in an attempt to secure their jobs and enhance their CVs...) Resist the temptation to launch into a new technology implementation without knowing realistically what you expect to get out of it. Difficulties with customization and integration with existing systems "No man is an island..." proves even more true of IT systems. V...
Read more

Not Orwell vs Huxley; but Orwell-Huxley

-
Orwell famously provided a disturbing view of the future in 1984 where the state controlled by Big Brother rules by fear through surveillance that removes all privacy, mind-numbing propaganda (' Newspeak ') and censorship to remove independent thought. It's usually seen as a diatribe against Stalinism . Huxley wrote Brave New World depicting a world where science and technology maximize pleasure, and all of life (including sex) is about 24/7 consumption. In his essay on Western society, Amusing Ourselves to Death , Neil Postman argued that Huxley, not Orwell, had been right. Certainly the casual observer of modern Western culture would find it easy to argue that hedonism rules much of our decision making. The utilitarianism that Huxley was writing to battle is still a dominant guide to many in public and private life who seek 'the greatest happiness of the greatest number' and - in the absence of generally accepted moral absolutes - consider that everything ...
Read more