1332 On the edge of a strategic disaster in the Strait of Hormuz: 4-star General

-

EN English (FR IT PT SP)

 

1332 On the edge of a strategic disaster in the Strait of Hormuz: 4-star General 

16 Mar 2026 The US is on the brink of a strategic disaster in the Strait of Hormuz, according to retired four-star general Barry McCaffrey. Despite successful air and naval strikes against Iran’s conventional military, the US faces a stalemate with Iran’s remaining tools: influencing energy supplies, terrorism, and cyber warfare. McCaffrey argues that the US needs to negotiate, lift economic sanctions, and allow inspectors back into Iran to address the nuclear programme.  

Key points

  • * Iran’s Military Capability: U.S. and Israeli forces have significantly weakened Iran’s conventional military strength. * Iran’s Remaining Options: Iran’s limited options include influencing energy supplies, targeting U.S. assets, and leveraging its influence in the region. * Potential Threats: Even a single terrorist attack on a slow-moving supertanker in the Strait of Hormuz could have significant economic consequences. * Strategic Disaster: The US is on the edge of a strategic disaster due to its approach to Iran, lacking a coalition and facing potential terrorism and cyber warfare. * Military Limitations: The US cannot sustain the current military effort for long, potentially only a few months. * Incoherent Approach: The Trump administration’s approach to Iran is incoherent and lacks a clear strategy. * Global Oil Market Impact: The price of oil is global and an increase in price will impact all countries, regardless of their oil dependency on Iran. * US Military’s Role: General Cain, chairman of the JCS, has been objective about the US military’s ability to carry out the mission, but he lacks command authority. * Iran’s Potential Actions: Iran’s ability to close the strait and the potential need for ground troops to address this are acknowledged as serious concerns. * Iran’s Military Capability: Iran has a large population and land area, and its military is capable of resisting a ground invasion. * US Military Options: The US military is capable of invading Iran, but it would be costly and the Trump administration is unlikely to consider it. * Negotiation as the Only Option: The US needs to negotiate with Iran, lift economic sanctions, and get inspectors back on the ground to address the nuclear program.

FR Frances (EN IT PT SP)

Français à venir

IT Italiano (EN FR PT SP)

Italiano presto disponibile

PT Português (EN FR IT SP)

Português em breve

SP Español (EN FR IT PT)

Español próximamente

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can't grok Gmail HAL - Privacy Trends unfolding

-
Image
Blame the Daleks : I've never got over the childhood scarring from knowing our sofa was just no match for their death rays! I consider myself fairly well-read, certainly with a vocabulary bigger than England's soccer manager Fabio Capello claims . But thanks to the Daleks I've never read much science fiction so, until today, I'd never heard the word 'grok.' Kim_Cameron   kim cameron   People didn't "get over it". [ http://tcrn.ch/fER72l ] DOES NOT COMPUTE yet - "creepy"  GMAIL   HAL  too far out to GROK. Just wait. Check out his  www.IdentityBlog.com It seems that ' grok ' means " to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed—to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science—and it means as little to us (because of our Earthling assumptions) as color means to a blind man. " @Kim_Cameron is...
Read more

CRM Problems

-
Image
I dug out some depressing numbers from the CRM world: only 30% of companies with a CRM implementation feel that they've had a positive return on their investment. Mostly, the issues are not technical ones (it's not that hard to get the software installed and some superficial training completed). But there are some similarities with many IT projects: Lack of agreed goals and business case "Fail to plan, plan to fail" is the old saw that is daily proved true. I've seen clients invest in new hardware and software for the wrong reasons. (Last year, one IT department wanted to buy new software to secure training for the existing team in an attempt to secure their jobs and enhance their CVs...) Resist the temptation to launch into a new technology implementation without knowing realistically what you expect to get out of it. Difficulties with customization and integration with existing systems "No man is an island..." proves even more true of IT systems. V...
Read more

Not Orwell vs Huxley; but Orwell-Huxley

-
Orwell famously provided a disturbing view of the future in 1984 where the state controlled by Big Brother rules by fear through surveillance that removes all privacy, mind-numbing propaganda (' Newspeak ') and censorship to remove independent thought. It's usually seen as a diatribe against Stalinism . Huxley wrote Brave New World depicting a world where science and technology maximize pleasure, and all of life (including sex) is about 24/7 consumption. In his essay on Western society, Amusing Ourselves to Death , Neil Postman argued that Huxley, not Orwell, had been right. Certainly the casual observer of modern Western culture would find it easy to argue that hedonism rules much of our decision making. The utilitarianism that Huxley was writing to battle is still a dominant guide to many in public and private life who seek 'the greatest happiness of the greatest number' and - in the absence of generally accepted moral absolutes - consider that everything ...
Read more