1448 Iran HITS Israeli Nuclear Site Dimona To Avenge Bushehr Nuke Zone Strike?

-

EN English (FR IT PT SP)

 

1448 Iran HITS Israeli Nuclear Site Dimona To Avenge Bushehr Nuke Zone Strike? 

18 Mar 2026 Iran allegedly targeted the Dimona nuclear research centre in response to a strike near its Bushehr nuclear power plant. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) confirmed the strike on the Bushehr plant but reported no damage or injuries. The incident occurred during the US-Israeli war on Iran, prompting calls for restraint to prevent a nuclear accident. 

The Russian Federation and China strongly condemn the recent armed aggression against Iran by the United States and Israel, calling it a violation of international law and the UN Charter. They urge a return to diplomatic negotiations and emphasise the importance of respecting Iran’s sovereignty and the authority of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The Kingdom of Bahrain, however, blames Iran for the escalating tensions, citing its nuclear activities and lack of cooperation with the IAEA.  

Key points

  • * Projectile Strike on Busher Nuclear Plant: A projectile struck near Iran’s Busher nuclear power plant, causing no damage or injuries. * Iran’s Response: Iran confirmed the strike to the IAEA and Tasnim news agency, stating the projectile hit near the plant at 7:00 p.m. local time. * International Reactions: The IAEA called for restraint, and Rosatam condemned the strike, reporting normal radiation levels. * UN Arms Embargo on Iran: All UN member states should implement an arms embargo against Iran, banning the transfer and trade of missile technology and freezing relevant financial assets. * Reason for UN Provisions: The UN provisions are narrowly scoped to address the threat posed by Iran’s nuclear, missile, and conventional arms programs and Iran’s ongoing support for terrorism. * Iran’s Rejection of Offers: Iran rejected offers from France, the United Kingdom, and Germany to extend the snapback mechanism if Iran accounted for its highly enriched uranium stockpile, complied with IAEA obligations, and resumed direct diplomacy with the United States. * Iran’s Destabilising Actions: Iran continues to evade sanctions, fire ballistic missiles and drones at civilians, attack shipping, and wreak havoc in the Strait of Hormuz. * International Condemnation of Iran: The UK expresses solidarity with partners in the Gulf and condemns Iran’s unprovoked missile and drone attacks, which endanger civilians and destabilise the region. * US Commitment to Counter Iran’s Threat: The US will continue to work to ensure Iran can no longer hold the world hostage with its missile, drone, and nuclear program. * Iran’s Missile Use: Iran’s repeated use of ballistic missiles has intensified regional insecurity and heightened the risk to civilians. * Iran’s Nuclear Program: Concerns about Iran’s nuclear program remain serious due to its failure to fulfil safeguard obligations and fully cooperate with the IAEA. * Condemnation of Aggression: Russia unequivocally condemns the recent act of armed aggression against Iran by the United States and Israel, stating it violates international law. * Call for Restraint: All parties involved in the conflict should exercise restraint, adhere to international law, and prioritise the safety of civilians. * Diplomatic Resolution for Iran Nuclear Issue: The Iran nuclear issue should be addressed through political and diplomatic means, with the US returning to negotiations and refraining from military action. * Importance of Non-Proliferation: Resolving the Iranian nuclear issue is crucial for maintaining the credibility of the international non-proliferation system and ensuring peace and stability in the Middle East. * China’s Stance: China will maintain an objective and impartial position, promote communication, and advocate for fairness. * Condemnation of Attacks: The international community strongly condemns the attacks on civilians and civilian facilities, which violate international humanitarian law. * Call for Security Council Action: Bahrain urges the Security Council to take decisive action to deter hostile acts and ensure regional and international security. * Call for Peace: The Middle East conflict must end, and a diplomatic solution is crucial. * Iran’s Role: Iran is blamed for the instability in the Middle East and violating international agreements. * Iran’s Nuclear Program: Iran’s nuclear activities are a major concern, with accusations of non-compliance and uranium enrichment.

FR Frances (EN IT PT SP)

Français à venir

IT Italiano (EN FR PT SP)

Italiano presto disponibile

PT Português (EN FR IT SP)

Português em breve

SP Español (EN FR IT PT)

Español próximamente

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Can't grok Gmail HAL - Privacy Trends unfolding

-
Image
Blame the Daleks : I've never got over the childhood scarring from knowing our sofa was just no match for their death rays! I consider myself fairly well-read, certainly with a vocabulary bigger than England's soccer manager Fabio Capello claims . But thanks to the Daleks I've never read much science fiction so, until today, I'd never heard the word 'grok.' Kim_Cameron   kim cameron   People didn't "get over it". [ http://tcrn.ch/fER72l ] DOES NOT COMPUTE yet - "creepy"  GMAIL   HAL  too far out to GROK. Just wait. Check out his  www.IdentityBlog.com It seems that ' grok ' means " to understand so thoroughly that the observer becomes a part of the observed—to merge, blend, intermarry, lose identity in group experience. It means almost everything that we mean by religion, philosophy, and science—and it means as little to us (because of our Earthling assumptions) as color means to a blind man. " @Kim_Cameron is...
Read more

CRM Problems

-
Image
I dug out some depressing numbers from the CRM world: only 30% of companies with a CRM implementation feel that they've had a positive return on their investment. Mostly, the issues are not technical ones (it's not that hard to get the software installed and some superficial training completed). But there are some similarities with many IT projects: Lack of agreed goals and business case "Fail to plan, plan to fail" is the old saw that is daily proved true. I've seen clients invest in new hardware and software for the wrong reasons. (Last year, one IT department wanted to buy new software to secure training for the existing team in an attempt to secure their jobs and enhance their CVs...) Resist the temptation to launch into a new technology implementation without knowing realistically what you expect to get out of it. Difficulties with customization and integration with existing systems "No man is an island..." proves even more true of IT systems. V...
Read more

Not Orwell vs Huxley; but Orwell-Huxley

-
Orwell famously provided a disturbing view of the future in 1984 where the state controlled by Big Brother rules by fear through surveillance that removes all privacy, mind-numbing propaganda (' Newspeak ') and censorship to remove independent thought. It's usually seen as a diatribe against Stalinism . Huxley wrote Brave New World depicting a world where science and technology maximize pleasure, and all of life (including sex) is about 24/7 consumption. In his essay on Western society, Amusing Ourselves to Death , Neil Postman argued that Huxley, not Orwell, had been right. Certainly the casual observer of modern Western culture would find it easy to argue that hedonism rules much of our decision making. The utilitarianism that Huxley was writing to battle is still a dominant guide to many in public and private life who seek 'the greatest happiness of the greatest number' and - in the absence of generally accepted moral absolutes - consider that everything ...
Read more